Michael Fassbender Goes From One Bronte To the Next
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Independent, Romance, Casting, Mystery & Suspense, Focus Features, Newsstand
The Brontes are all the rage for adaptation right now. It's undoubtedly due to Edward and Bella bestowing their favor on Wuthering Heights, and had they chosen Great Expectations, perhaps we'd see Dickens adaptations flinging themselves to the big screen. I love corsets and cravats, so I'm not going to complain, and I'm certainly not going to whine if Cary Fukunaga gets this cast for Jane Eyre. Variety is reporting that Michael Fassbender and Mia Wasikowska are in talks to play Jane and Rochester for Fukunaga, and oh, how torrid it would be!This is actually the second time Fassbender has circled a Bronte adaptation. Last May, he was said to be in talks for Wuthering Heights, but Ed Westwick stepped into that particular waistcoat. It's a shame. I think Fassbender would have made an excellent Heathcliff, and may have been the first one to actually snarl, bang his head against a tree, and slap people convincingly. But he will make a very simmering Rochester, and is the only actor who could top Toby Stephens' wonderful turn in 2006.
Wasikowska is still a bit of a dark horse. She's becoming one of those much-discussed names, but most of us have yet to really meet her until Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland hits theaters. She's very pretty, but is just "ordinary" (if that doesn't sound too terrible) enough to fit the part of plain Jane, and as an Aussie, she'll be able to turn on an English accent better than Ellen Page. If this is the Jane Eyre that makes it to the screen, I'll be happy. Let the eerie screams, mysterious fires, and lingering looks commence.
Related Headlines
Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-20-2009 @ 4:07PM
weetiger3 said...
Sign me up! Holy crap I'm all over this one! *deep breath* Ok, I'm calm now-considering it will be at least a year before I can buy a ticket, if it comes to fruition at all.
While I think Fassbender would have made an excellent Heathcliffe (I'm sorry...ED WESTWICK!?!?) Tom Hardy in last year's BBC production knocked my socks off.
Reply
11-20-2009 @ 5:07PM
Reedo said...
Y'know, this'll probably be a perfectly decent movie, but... Rochester is supposed to be ugly. Like, just flat-out ugly. Jane is plain, and Rochester is actively unattractive.
Now, I'm as much of a pushover as anybody (the Timothy Dalton version of "Jane Eyre" may well be my favorite, and Mr. Dalton is certainly easy on the eyes), but I'm kind of tired of the pretty Rochesters. Thank goodness for Toby Stephens' turn in the role.
Anyway, yes, the movie will probably be well done and a lot of fun, and of course I plan to see it, and Fassbender is a talented actor, but yeah, he's not exactly the perfect Rochester.
(As a side note, Heathcliff is actually portrayed as ambiguously racialized in the novel. It's about time to move past all of the pretty white guys for that, too.)
Reply
11-20-2009 @ 5:14PM
Elisabeth said...
Oh, it annoys the hell out of me that every casting director has cast Heathcliff as an Englishman. It's repeated over and over again in the book that he's "swarthy" and "a gypsy child." No one has ever cast a Spanish or Slavic actor in the role, and I think that would be so much more accurate. When I was younger, I always wanted to see Goran Visnjic do it, but now I think they need to look to Benicio Del Toro.
But English book, English actor ... sigh
11-20-2009 @ 5:25PM
Reedo said...
I've never had anyone outside of a Victorian literature course agree with me on the Heathcliff point before! How fun. I totally agree with you about Goran Visnjic, but I'm not as sure about Del Toro. He's a great actor, don't get me wrong, but I've always thought of Heathcliff more in a Slavic/Romani vein than in a Spanish one.
Just to take this one step further, Bertha Rochester was also portrayed as ambigously racial. She was from Jamaica and described as "dark" and bestial (which would've applied to blacks or partial-blacks in the imperialist [racist] British discourse). Sigh.
11-20-2009 @ 5:44PM
Elisabeth said...
LOL, it's the first time I've had this convo with anyone outside English too. :D Everyone just says "Did you ever see the Laurence Olivier one?"
I don't even care if they cast Heathcliff as handsome -- I always figured we were getting one person's perspective on the story, and beauty was in the eye of the beholder. But to cast someone as young and tender as Ed Westwick or even Tom Hardy (who did ok, but I expected something a lot meaner out of him) just really defangs the character. I can't believe no director has ever wanted to tap into the uglier parts of the character and the story. I know it's romantic, but it was the darkness of the obsession that I loved, not the playtime on the moors.
At least there's the book. It can outlast any adaptation, and Twilight too. :P
11-20-2009 @ 4:56PM
AD said...
Awful choice. They should have gone with Carey Mulligan. She would have been perfect!!!
Reply
11-20-2009 @ 4:59PM
nelson said...
Orson Welles is the definitive Rochester, but I do love me some Fassbender. That dude (along with Christoph Waltz) MADE Inglorious Basterds for me. Such an awesome performance.
Reply
11-21-2009 @ 1:41PM
Bondo said...
I don't have any knowledge of Bronte works so I can't talk suitability, but I do think Mia is something special having seen her in both In Treatment and, at the Denver Film Festival, That Evening Sun. I thought she has been terrific in both.
Reply